Commit message will be:
New ports required for gitlab update to 10.5.x.
Reviewed by: tz/swills (mentor)
Approved by: tz/swills (mentor)
Differential Revision: URL to this revision
Details
Details
- Reviewers
tz swills - Commits
- rP465602: New ports required for gitlab update to 10.5.x.
All patches are build, you can find all build logs:
https://pkg.fechner.net/jail.html?mastername=111amd64-gitlab
The fresh packages are tested against a new installation using:
https://gitlab.fechner.net/mfechner/Gitlab-vagrant
An old version is updated following the manual:
https://gitlab.fechner.net/mfechner/Gitlab-docu
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP FreeBSD ports repository
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Since its not possible to see it in the git diffs:
Did you create the ports with an svn repo-copy?
It looks like you didn't since security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect for example exists as 1.2.0 in the tree. You should perform:
$ cd /usr/ports
$ svn cp security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect@455061 security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect12
455061 is the revision where the port had the required version:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=455061
The svn syntax means, that it should copy the dir security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect with the content of revision 455061 into security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect12. This way the ports share one history and its very easy to track them.
Comment Actions
What I did was (e.g. for port security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect12):
svn copy security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect12
and then updated the files in the new directory.
Added in the ../Makefile this new port.
I also removed and changed some lines that porlint -ACN is fine.
Is this ok?
Comment Actions
No, it misses the '@rev' part, which makes your life much easier. Also it makes history clear.
Comment Actions
Executed now the following steps:
svn revert --recursive .
svn copy databases/rubygem-pg@414136 databases/rubygem-pg018
svn copy devel/rubygem-google-protobuf@458063 devel/rubygem-google-protobuf351
svn copy security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect@455061 security/rubygem-doorkeeper-openid_connect12
svn copy net/rubygem-gitaly-proto@460399 net/rubygem-gitaly-proto083
svn copy net/rubygem-gitaly-proto@460894 net/rubygem-gitaly-proto084
Added the new ports to the ../Makefile.
Fixed the Makefile (including error messages shown by "portlint -ACN"), added myself as maintainer, added PORTSCOUT line and if required a CONFLICTS_INSTALL.
Next step would be then to do a "svn commit".
Comment Actions
Added the new ports to the ../Makefile.
Fixed the Makefile (including error messages shown by "portlint -ACN"), added myself as maintainer, added PORTSCOUT line and if required a CONFLICTS_INSTALL.Next step would be then to do a "svn commit".
Next step is to update the review ;)
Than i can have a look and approve
| net/rubygem-gitaly-proto083/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 | If you comment it out - just remove it! | |
Comment Actions
Should I undo the TIMESTAMP modification? I prepared the diffs long time ago I had access to SVN.