Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

subr_blist: end ffs backup
ClosedPublic

Authored by dougm on Jun 21 2023, 5:52 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F102659694: D40703.id123626.diff
Fri, Nov 15, 11:49 AM
F102657401: D40703.diff
Fri, Nov 15, 11:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 25, 6:15 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 27 2024, 7:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 27 2024, 7:20 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 25 2024, 9:58 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 25 2024, 4:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 25 2024, 3:16 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

After D40698 is committed, there will no longer be any point to maintaining a binary search routine for ffs; inlines will always do it as well or better.

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

dougm requested review of this revision.Jun 21 2023, 5:52 PM
dougm created this revision.
mhorne added inline comments.
sys/kern/subr_blist.c
191–193

_Static_assert is to be preferred (see CTASSERT(9)). And why not ==?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 21 2023, 8:31 PM
mhorne requested changes to this revision.Jun 21 2023, 8:31 PM

Wrong button :)

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jun 21 2023, 8:31 PM
dougm marked an inline comment as done.

Switch CTASSERT to _Static_assert.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 22 2023, 7:45 PM
sys/kern/subr_blist.c
191–193

I'll change to _Static_assert.

If somebody someday makes a change that makes u_daddr_t 32-bits on some architecture, should this assert fail for that architecture? fffsll will still work correctly.