Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F149933454: D36781.id.diff
Sat, Mar 28, 5:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 25, 5:45 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Mar 22, 7:48 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 20, 9:20 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 18, 1:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 18, 1:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 12 2026, 3:49 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 14 2026, 11:27 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 47593
Build 44480: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)