Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 5, 8:07 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 5, 7:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 5, 7:29 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 22, 10:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 10, 5:53 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 10, 3:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 10, 10:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 6 2026, 10:30 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)