Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Dec 6, 2:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 21, 12:18 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 16, 11:44 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 15, 11:45 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 5 2025, 8:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 24 2025, 2:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 18 2025, 4:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 10 2025, 7:02 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)