Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F152991315: D36781.id111161.diff
Sat, Apr 18, 12:32 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Apr 18, 4:09 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Apr 17, 9:16 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Apr 16, 2:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Apr 9, 8:58 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Mar 28, 5:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 25, 5:45 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Mar 22, 7:48 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)