Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jan 14, 11:27 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jan 13, 12:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jan 8, 9:35 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jan 6, 5:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 31, 12:42 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 16 2025, 11:31 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 6 2025, 2:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 21 2025, 12:18 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)