Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 10, 7:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 10, 7:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 10, 7:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 10, 1:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Oct 5, 2:43 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 26 2025, 9:46 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 3 2025, 6:58 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jun 30 2025, 10:57 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)