Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

linux32: binutils as requires %eflags instead of %flags for CFI.
ClosedPublic

Authored by jhb on Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 10:22 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 10:22 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 10:13 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, May 2, 11:23 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Apr 27, 11:39 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Apr 25, 1:10 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Apr 23, 7:06 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Apr 18, 12:32 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

jhb requested review of this revision.Sep 28 2022, 9:40 PM

Does clang work with %eflags?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 9:42 PM
In D36781#834878, @kib wrote:

Does clang work with %eflags?

No. :( (I tried). Arguably %eflags is more correct, and possibly it should be reported as a bug to LLVM upstream to use the eflags/rflags names.

(Adding dim@ in case he wants to report an upstream bug about supporting %eflags upstream)