[NEW] devel/vipack: a language- and dependency-agnostic package manager vipack is a language- and dependency-agnostic package manager. WWW: https://github.com/vishaps/vipack Reviewd_by: ??? Differential_Revision: D34810 Sponsored_by: illuria Security, Inc.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
0mp - Group Reviewers
Ports Committers
portlint: passed
testport: passed
runtime: We use (and develop) the port at illuria Security, Inc.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP FreeBSD ports repository
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 45046 Build 41934: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Otherwise, seems pretty much ready to be shipped.
| devel/vipack/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 | ||
| 10 | If there is a license file, it would be nice to set LICENSE_FILE. | |
| 16 | Note: Even though there are some ports already in the ports tree which depend on git@lite, I'm not sure if that's a good default due to conflicts with the default devel/git flavor. | |
| 22 | GH_PROJECT defaults to PORTNAME. | |
| 36 | STRIP_CMD is not necessary when INSTALL_PROGRAM is used. | |
| devel/vipack/files/patch-makefile_freebsd | ||
| 24 | I've not read the makefile but if we already change all: deps to all perhaps there is no need to remove the deps target completely. This way we can reduce the patch. | |
| devel/vipack/pkg-descr | ||
| 2 | Maybe the desc. could include some indication why someone would want to use and how it compares to pkg or pip? | |
Comment Actions
- devel/vipack: Update to v0.9.1, include LICENSE_FILE, use devel/git, and improve the pkg-descr
| devel/vipack/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 | It makes total sense, right. It doesn't need git for BUILD_DEPENDS, by the way. It was for testing (before I use GH_TUPLE), and I forgot to remove it, my apologies. | |
| 36 | Ah, perfect! Thanks, I didn't know. | |
| devel/vipack/files/patch-makefile_freebsd | ||
| 24 | Completely true. I thought it might be more descriptive to remove deps as well. OK, I'll update. | |