security/openssl-devel: Update to 1.1 BETA2 (1.1.0-pre5)

[brnrd]

Summary

Proposed commit log:

security/openssl-devel: Update to 1.1 BETA2 (1.1.0-pre5)

  - Update to first BETA of OpenSSL 1.1
  - Bump SHLIB_VERSION for 1.1 to 9
  - Add missing libressl-devel conflict
  - Mark jobs-safe
  - Add upstream clang fix (Issue 888)
  - Fix renamed shared engines (remove 'lib' prefix)
  - Remove "overwrite base" check
  - Do not install html docs

Reviewed_by:	feld (mentor), koobs (mentor)
Approved by:	(mentor)
Differential_Revision:	D5900

Test Plan

• portlint -AC
• poudriere testport
• test with D5865 SSL ports framework revamp

[koobs]

security/openssl-devel/Makefile

125–126 ↗

(On Diff #15051)

This should be done with USES=pathfix

[brnrd]

Use USES=pathfix instead of REINPLACE_CMD

[brnrd]

pathfix is not the right way to go here

• shuffle around some of the Makefile fixes

[brnrd]

Clobbering all DOCS / manpages was there only to speed up debugging the Makefile

[brnrd]

security/openssl-devel/Makefile

125–126 ↗

(On Diff #15051)

Not here with the home-grown perl configure. I could get pathfix to work by modifying Configurations/unix-Makefile.tmpl but ended up with the pkgconf data in **/usr/local/usr/local**/libdata/pkgconfig so I had to revert to REINPLACE_CMD

[koobs]

In D5900#126517, @brnrd wrote:

pathfix is not the right way to go here

• shuffle around some of the Makefile fixes

Why didn't it work?

Did you use PATHFIX_MAKEFILEIN=Makefile to override the default file (Makefile.in) USES=pathfix uses?

[brnrd]

! In D5900#126974, @koobs wrote:
Why didn't it work?

Did you use PATHFIX_MAKEFILEIN=Makefile to override the default file (Makefile.in) USES=pathfix uses?

Issue is that this is not standard autoconf/automake but home-grown Perl-based. It would add ${PREFIX} twice in the path leading to hier(7) violations and strange /usr/local/usr/local/include paths.

[brnrd]

Update to OpenSSL 1.1.0-pre5 (BETA2)