Status/2026Q2/scheduler.adoc: Add report

[emaste]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

18

[olce]

Fix item lists.

[olce]

Fix typo (missing space).

[minsoochoo0122_proton.me]

I would like to add bit more:

• 4BSD: Switch from MAXCPU fixed-length array to DPCPU for runq_pcpu (D58000 please review)
• Some legacy cleanups on 4BSD and scheduler.9, runq.9, and sched_4bsd.4 man pages. Currently WIP at https://github.com/mchoo7/freebsd-src/tree/4bsd

[olce]

• 4BSD: Switch from MAXCPU fixed-length array to DPCPU for runq_pcpu (D58000 please review)

Ok, reviewed this one, which needs more work, but will list it.

• Some legacy cleanups on 4BSD and scheduler.9, runq.9, and sched_4bsd.4 man pages. Currently WIP at https://github.com/mchoo7/freebsd-src/tree/4bsd

These are quite minor and to be reviewed, it's probably easier to mention them in next report.

[olce]

• Add mention to D58000's work

[minsoochoo0122_proton.me]

Thanks!

[gperciva_tarsnap.com]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

12

13

[olce]

Cater to gpercival's comments

[olce]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

13

Done, although that sounds slightly strange to my ears, but I'm not a native speaker.

[gperciva_tarsnap.com]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

13

One thing that makes it sound a bit strange is that the FreeBSD doc style has a rule about not using contractions (such as "ULE's").

English speakers use them all the time, English books use them all the time, and non-formal English writing (such as emails, blog posts, git commit messages, etc.) use them all the time. I even see them in some academic conference and journal papers!

So it's [sic] very understandable that when we avoid them, the language doesn't [sic] sound normal.

[olce]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

13

Contractions are to be avoided, yes. But then, a fine point of grammar (at least from my POV). Feels pretty obvious to me that 's is a contraction when replacing is ("the cat's black"). But is the possessive "'s" really considered a contraction also? Out of curiosity, contraction of what?

[gperciva_tarsnap.com]

website/content/en/status/report-2026-04-2026-06/scheduler.adoc

13

Sorry, my bad! You're correct, "ULE's" was ok, and it's not a contraction.

The original text was:

with current ULE's design,

which has the word "current" in the wrong place. I suggest either:

with the current ULE design [my originally proposed text]

or

with ULE's current design [which might flow better?]