Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Calendars: Update status reports deadlines
ClosedPublic

Authored by salvadore on Feb 24 2026, 4:25 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Apr 3, 8:45 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Mar 17, 1:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 16, 11:56 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 11, 11:59 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 11, 10:58 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 11, 10:04 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Mar 10, 6:13 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 9, 3:53 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Also move the deadlines in their own calendar file.

Reported by: jhs

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

salvadore created this revision.

I'm not familiar with the calendar syntax, but calendar.freebsd has format date desc whereas calendar.status_reports has date: desc. Just making sure that that's intentional and acceptable. Other than that, these dates and descriptions all look correct to me.

usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.status_reports
16

June only has 30 days.

21

September only has 30 days.

Fix June and September last day of the month

Sorry, did you actually change the dates? It looks like the version on Phabricator still lists 6/31 and 9/31. Is the website slow to update the diff it displays?

Sorry, did you actually change the dates? It looks like the version on Phabricator still lists 6/31 and 9/31. Is the website slow to update the diff it displays?

No no, he's updating ISO 8601, not this file, which'll take a minute. Committees and such.

Sorry, did you actually change the dates? It looks like the version on Phabricator still lists 6/31 and 9/31. Is the website slow to update the diff it displays?

I thought I did, but apparently I did not... Sorry, I am using this simple review to relearn how to use arcanist and apparently I did something wrong. Let me try again.

Try again to fix last days of June and September

Ok, this time it worked. No idea what I did wrong the first time, I thought I had run the same exact command...

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Wed, Mar 11, 2:50 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.