Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Allow caller of callout_stop_safe() to interpret one case of stop failure.

Authored by kib on Feb 6 2016, 7:14 PM.



So from rrs feedback on D3115, some uses of callout_stop_safe() do want the return value of 0 when we prevented the migration, while other cases, in particular, sleepq use, require it to report that the callout was running. I do not see any other way around than to allow caller to explicitely request the desired behaviour (assuming the statement of the tcp code wanting the return (0) is true).

The patch below does just that, and from cognet@ testing, it solves the issue for sleepqueue.

Diff Detail

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.

Event Timeline

kib retitled this revision from to Allow caller of callout_stop_safe() to interpret one case of stop failure..
kib updated this object.
kib edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
kib added reviewers: jhb, rrs.
kib set the repository for this revision to rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion.

In essence, the situation shoul be clear: there is a previous instance of callback running, and there is scheduled new instance. The new instance is cancelled, the previous is not. For sleepqueue it is critical to know that the new callback would be never run, otherwise sleepq code waits for its action and the thread never becomes runnable.

jhb edited edge metadata.
jhb added inline comments.
1165 ↗(On Diff #13097)

Possibly rename 'safe' to 'flags' now that it is a flags field rather than a boolean.

65 ↗(On Diff #13097)

It might be nice to document these flags here.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 1 2016, 6:29 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.