Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

etdump.1: Polish + xref cd9660(4)
ClosedPublic

Authored by ziaee on Jan 19 2025, 3:03 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 21, 8:22 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Mar 16, 2:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Mar 15, 7:06 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Mar 4, 3:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Mar 2, 2:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 18 2025, 6:22 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 3 2025, 12:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 27 2025, 8:03 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

+ correct misfile in section 8
+ rewrite the document descirption to include -9660
+ markup command modifiers as such instead of bold
+ markup variables as defined variables, enabling apropos
+ correct option syntax in description section
+ unwrap list offsets for legibility
+ fix line wrapping for standard BSD console
+ crossreference cd9660(4) and vis versa
+ tag SPDX for both manuals

MFC after: 3 days

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

ziaee requested review of this revision.Jan 19 2025, 3:03 AM
mhorne requested changes to this revision.Jan 24 2025, 8:09 PM

From where are you getting your line-wrap rules? style.mdoc(5) is silent on this, but the existing tendency is to wrap single sentences at 80 characters (the source code limit declared by style(9)), and of course follow the one-line-per-sentence rule (although some man pages break lines semantically).

Wrapping at 50 characters is not necessary.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jan 24 2025, 8:09 PM

I'm not wrapping at 50. I wrap at 72 for compatiblity with the bsd text editor, vi, on the standard bsd console (80). The reason I wrap them a little before 72 is break them in the least awkward place grammatically.

You are right sir, one of my lines certainly should be combined.
Please excuse the delay.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Fri, Mar 21, 2:55 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.