doc/status: Add Foundation status
AbandonedPublic
Actions

Authored by salvadore on Jan 9 2025, 12:42 PM.

Details

Reviewers

jrm
bofh

Summary

Split into different files
As I am also here mention about multiple staffs in CI and also all of the CI works are mentioned in the CI status report. So refer to them.
Added a ports file where I have mentioned the work I have done for the ports.
Added a cluster file where I have mentioned about deploying the Grimoirelab.
Totally skipped mentioning about CIS as it does not fall in any groups.

Diff Detail

Repository

R9 FreeBSD doc repository

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

bofh created this revision.Jan 9 2025, 12:42 PM

Herald added a reviewer: salvadore. · View Herald TranscriptJan 9 2025, 12:42 PM

bofh requested review of this revision.Jan 9 2025, 12:42 PM

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

In D48392#1103769, @bofh wrote:

In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

I requested that you submit one or more report entries that are specific to your work like the other Foundation developers. For example:

If you plan to completely overwrite this review with your content, that also works.

In D48392#1103774, @jrm wrote:

In D48392#1103769, @bofh wrote:

In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

I requested that you submit one or more report entries that are specific to your work like the other Foundation developers. For example:

https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/suspend.adoc

https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/wireless-iwx.adoc

https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/audio.adoc

https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/website/content/en/status/report-2024-10-2024-12/foundation-security.adoc

...

If you plan to completely overwrite this review with your content, that also works.

Yeah that's what you clarified after the miscommunication. So I am working on completely overwriting this content.

Split into different files
As I am also here mention about multiple staffs in CI and also all of the CI works are mentioned in the CI status report. So refer to them.
Added a ports file where I have mentioned the work I have done for the ports.
Added a cluster file where I have mentioned about deploying the Grimoirelab.
Totally skipped mentioning about CIS as it does not fall in any groups.

I am a bit confused about this review (that I had totally forgotten, sorry).
Does it actually need to be merged? These reports are very short and do not add much to the other reports we already have. In particular we already have a clusteradm report and, hopefully, @lwhsu is about to send a ci report.