Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

doc/status: Add Foundation status
AbandonedPublic

Authored by salvadore on Jan 9 2025, 12:42 PM.
Tags
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 13, 1:34 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 24, 5:12 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 17 2025, 4:32 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 16 2025, 8:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 13 2025, 10:37 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 12 2025, 12:12 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 11 2025, 4:17 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 9 2025, 9:19 PM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
jrm
bofh
Summary
  • Split into different files
  • As I am also here mention about multiple staffs in CI and also all of the CI works are mentioned in the CI status report. So refer to them.
  • Added a ports file where I have mentioned the work I have done for the ports.
  • Added a cluster file where I have mentioned about deploying the Grimoirelab.
  • Totally skipped mentioning about CIS as it does not fall in any groups.

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

bofh requested review of this revision.Jan 9 2025, 12:42 PM

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

I requested that you submit one or more report entries that are specific to your work like the other Foundation developers. For example:

If you plan to completely overwrite this review with your content, that also works.

In D48392#1103774, @jrm wrote:
In D48392#1103768, @jrm wrote:

This was submitted based on a miscommunication. I'm preparing the Foundation entry, but waiting on some authors to share their contributions. @bofh, could you please close this revision?

I am working on an updated patch as suggested by you. Or do you want me to close the revision and send you the text?

I requested that you submit one or more report entries that are specific to your work like the other Foundation developers. For example:

...

If you plan to completely overwrite this review with your content, that also works.

Yeah that's what you clarified after the miscommunication. So I am working on completely overwriting this content.

bofh edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)
  • Split into different files
  • As I am also here mention about multiple staffs in CI and also all of the CI works are mentioned in the CI status report. So refer to them.
  • Added a ports file where I have mentioned the work I have done for the ports.
  • Added a cluster file where I have mentioned about deploying the Grimoirelab.
  • Totally skipped mentioning about CIS as it does not fall in any groups.

I am a bit confused about this review (that I had totally forgotten, sorry).
Does it actually need to be merged? These reports are very short and do not add much to the other reports we already have. In particular we already have a clusteradm report and, hopefully, @lwhsu is about to send a ci report.

Yes, this information is in other report entries, so this can be closed.

salvadore abandoned this revision.
salvadore edited reviewers, added: bofh; removed: salvadore.