sysutils/u-boot-bhyve-arm64: Fix after the 2024.01 import

[markj]

Summary

Because this config is not yet upstreamed (pending arm64/bhyve/vmm
actually landing in main), we have to maintain our own for the time
being.

Tweak the config to work around two problems which arose after the
latest update:

• EFI support implies SMBIOS support, which requires that we implement a finalizer, which we don't have. Since SMBIOS support isn't required, just remove it.
• Don't configure EVENT, as we don't use it, and its configuration implies that we implement a hook that runs immediately before command processing.

[manu]

You need to set U_BOOT_SLAVE_PORTREVISION_2024.01= 1 in the Makefile too.

[jrtc27]

I suspect this isn't the right approach long-term, but this works in my local testing. This will need U_BOOT_SLAVE_PORTREVISION_2024.01 to be set, but perhaps best to batch that with the patch I have and was trying to test when I encountered this regression?

[markj]

Bump PORTREVISION.

[markj]

In D43784#998538, @jrtc27 wrote:

I suspect this isn't the right approach long-term, but this works in my local testing.

It definitely isn't. Really I'm waiting for arm64/vmm to land in main so that I can commit the userspace bits, then I will work to get this configuration upstreamed. In the meantime I'm happy to fix fallout from updates.

[jrtc27]

In D43784#998538, @jrtc27 wrote:

I suspect this isn't the right approach long-term, but this works in my local testing. This will need U_BOOT_SLAVE_PORTREVISION_2024.01 to be set, but perhaps best to batch that with the patch I have and was trying to test when I encountered this regression?

FYI this is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43785. I don't mind bumping the version again, but it does seem a little silly.

[markj]

In D43784#998554, @jrtc27 wrote:

In D43784#998538, @jrtc27 wrote:

I suspect this isn't the right approach long-term, but this works in my local testing. This will need U_BOOT_SLAVE_PORTREVISION_2024.01 to be set, but perhaps best to batch that with the patch I have and was trying to test when I encountered this regression?

FYI this is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43785. I don't mind bumping the version again, but it does seem a little silly.

Oh, yes. Would you like to merge the patches and push? If not I'll take care of it now.

[jrtc27]

In D43784#998561, @markj wrote:

In D43784#998554, @jrtc27 wrote:

In D43784#998538, @jrtc27 wrote:

I suspect this isn't the right approach long-term, but this works in my local testing. This will need U_BOOT_SLAVE_PORTREVISION_2024.01 to be set, but perhaps best to batch that with the patch I have and was trying to test when I encountered this regression?

FYI this is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43785. I don't mind bumping the version again, but it does seem a little silly.

Oh, yes. Would you like to merge the patches and push? If not I'll take care of it now.

Feel free to take care of it all, thanks.

[manu]

Would be better to do only one commit yes.