Remove unneeded CA_BUNDLE option.

[des]

Summary

MFH: 2023Q4

[fluffy]

[brnrd]

irc/weechat had a pending update. Incorporated the CA_BUNDLE change.

Hope that doesn't disrupt your workflow too much... WHY does it delete all the other changes :'(

[des]

In D42073#959825, @brnrd wrote:

WHY does it delete all the other changes :'(

Because you told Phabricator that your commit was the final version of this differential.

[des]

rebase

[sunpoet]

LGTM for devel/mercurial. Thanks.

[brnrd]

In D42073#959887, @des wrote:

In D42073#959825, @brnrd wrote:

WHY does it delete all the other changes :'(

Because you told Phabricator that your commit was the final version of this differential.

All I did is refer to this review in the commit message. Learned something new!

[des]

rebase

[des]

rebase

[des]

rebase

[fullermd_over-yonder.net]

NACK for devel/brz. It really wants a single bundle file to point to. I did a little experimentation, and didn't come up with a simple clean patch to work around it, so it'll take a bit more work and upstream engagement to gently beat it into shape.

(I'm assuming the goal here is "let's wind down unnecessary uses of this", not "stop using this everywhere immediately!!1!", so this is a "plan to", not "drop everything to")

[des]

I think we're going to end up having to have certctl(8) produce a bundle in addition to the hashed directory.