sysutils/xosview: unbreak in 12

[fernape]

Summary

Broken due to changes in sys/vmmeter.h

https://github.com/hills/xosview/pull/11 to upstream project

Test Plan

• portlint -AC OK
• poudriere builds for {10.4,11.1}{amd64,i386}, 12i386 OK
• run test in 11.2 OK

[tcberner]

Good job, working on that :)

I would use the contents of
https://github.com/hills/xosview/commit/0b4861c9fed2dc8450edf2dff7988ebd784a520b.patch
as the patch file (you only need to fix the git-prefix stuff) -- if it applies :) -- otherwise, I would inclulde the link to the pull request at the top of the patch.

If the git-patch works, you could also name it something like patch-git_0b4861c -- that way its obvious that the patch is most likely a temporary thing.

[fernape]

Add git pull request link to the patch.

[fernape]

In D16747#359413, @tcberner wrote:

Good job, working on that :)

I would use the contents of
https://github.com/hills/xosview/commit/0b4861c9fed2dc8450edf2dff7988ebd784a520b.patch
as the patch file (you only need to fix the git-prefix stuff) -- if it applies :) -- otherwise, I would inclulde the link to the pull request at the top of the patch.

If the git-patch works, you could also name it something like patch-git_0b4861c -- that way its obvious that the patch is most likely a temporary thing.

I tried but it doesn't seem to work. After fixing the git-prefix by removing a/ and b/ sutff, the patch finds the proper file to patch but fails to apply the changes. I think the reason is that patch-bsd_kernel.cc is applied first and it adds three lines above the changes in the git-patch. This somehow confuses patch (probably for the better).

I added the link to the pull request instead.

[tcberner]

In D16747#359840, @fernape wrote:

In D16747#359413, @tcberner wrote:

Good job, working on that :)

I would use the contents of
https://github.com/hills/xosview/commit/0b4861c9fed2dc8450edf2dff7988ebd784a520b.patch
as the patch file (you only need to fix the git-prefix stuff) -- if it applies :) -- otherwise, I would inclulde the link to the pull request at the top of the patch.

If the git-patch works, you could also name it something like patch-git_0b4861c -- that way its obvious that the patch is most likely a temporary thing.

I tried but it doesn't seem to work. After fixing the git-prefix by removing a/ and b/ sutff, the patch finds the proper file to patch but fails to apply the changes. I think the reason is that patch-bsd_kernel.cc is applied first and it adds three lines above the changes in the git-patch. This somehow confuses patch (probably for the better).

I added the link to the pull request instead.

yeah sorry, I overlooke d that the patch wasn't completely new :)