Add PNP info to PCI attachment of et, iir, ignore, isab, ips, ipw, ismt, iwm, ix, ixgb, ixv drivers

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

Summary

Update PNP info to PCI attachment of ismt driver
Update PNP info to PCI attachment of ips driver
Update PNP info to PCI attachment of iir driver
Update PNP info to PCI attachment of isab driver

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

• Update PNP info to PCI attachment of ignore driver

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ismt driver

[chuck]

sys/dev/iir/iir_pci.c

180

Now that the driver has a device table, should probe be modified to use it?

sys/dev/ips/ips_pci.c

63

style(9) nits including:

• Unary operators do not require spaces, binary operators do.
• Indentation is an 8 character tab.
• Blank line between variable declaration and code.
• Space between for and open paren and between close paren and brace

235

Should this include D:#?

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of isab driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ignore driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ix driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ixv driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ixgb driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ips driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of iwm driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ipw driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of iir driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of et driver
• Add PNP info to PCI attachment of ismt driver

[imp]

I think we should consider doing a pci_lookup() routine. It would make a lot of this simpler...

sys/dev/et/if_et.c

191

I may have suggested this already, but a adding ;D# here would be good.

sys/dev/iir/iir_pci.c

172

Same here.

sys/dev/ipw/if_ipw.c

205

I'd add ;D# here as well.

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

I have added a ;D:# wherever needed in this differential review. I was having a problem since yesterday with updating the diff review using arcanist. It is stuck at a step - >>> [18] <http> https://reviews.freebsd.org/api/differential.querydiffs Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't and i just got it to work a couple of hours back. I am up for a discussion tomorrow on pci_lookup() routine.

[chuck]

sys/dev/iir/iir_pci.c

187

I understand why this if-else is necessary, but that same necessity makes me wonder if a table lookup for this device class is "wrong". If it was possible to encode this as a part of PNP (can you combine L16 and G16?) maybe this would make more sense.

sys/dev/ips/ips_pci.c

63

Better, but for() should be:
for (i = 0; i < nitems(ips_pci_devs) - 1; i++) {
Fix here and elsewhere.

sys/dev/pci/isa_pci.c

155–163

style(9)

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

• Update PNP info to PCI attachment of isab driver
• Update PNP info to PCI attachment of ips driver
• Update PNP info to PCI attachment of ismt driver

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

sys/dev/ips/ips_pci.c

63

This is how i can see it. "for (i = 0; i < nitems(ips_pci_devs) - 1; i++) {"
Is it for some reason not showing you the latest code ?
However, there is no space between if and left parentheses which i fixed now.

sys/dev/pci/isa_pci.c

155–163

for looks fine to me.
Between if and left parenthseses there was no space, which i fixed now.

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

sys/dev/iir/iir_pci.c

187

I need some help from @imp to use L16 and G16 correctly.

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

sys/dev/ips/ips_pci.c

63

Understood, the space between i and nitems. My bad ! Fixed it.

sys/dev/pci/isa_pci.c

155–163

Understood, fixed it now!

[lakhanshiva_gmail.com]

Converted spaces to tabs (inside probe functions)