Obviously, go ahead!

With a different date, of course, my bad.

Sorry, guys, I kind of thought it was committed already. Will do so with today's security updates.

Looks good to me, but as I don't have dev environment working right now, can't test.

Looks good to me, please, proceed!

I'm accepting this revision, although the resulting samba412 is coming from my own development tree with some additions from this request. I hope, nothing was lost in such a merge, but if you spot that something is missing - please, let me know!

http://samba.org.ru/FreeBSD/ports/samba412/ or http://samba.org.ru/FreeBSD/ports/samba412.tar.gz

In D26491#590242, @se wrote:

Maybe we should create a GitHub repository for this update (initialize with the net/samba411 port and apply the patch or copy the new port over it). This would allow to co-ordinate further work. Or do you already have it available i some public repo?

In D26491#589849, @se wrote:

I have added the explicit dependencies on ICU and UNWIND due to stage-qa output.
They may be required and included by dependencies, not Samba itself - I did not check that and since I had both already installed would have noticed if they had been found by accident only.
A poduriere build should give an answer whether the explicit dependencies are required (well, probably not, if you removed them before).
I did not test build in poudriere since too many dependencies needed to be upgraded first and I wanted to spend my limited time on getting the other issues resolved ...

Thanks, that at least is readable :)

Thank you for your submission, but I have to admit it's a huge one and really, can't be observed easily.

In D26491#589567, @daniel.engberg.lists_pyret.net wrote:

Apparently iXsystems maintain their own version which they might want to maintain upstream?

I guess you miss the point.. For nsupdate to be any usable as a intermediator between Samba and bind9 it has to be compiled against (some) Kerberos library.

LGTM

LGTM

LGTM