Details

Reviewers

None

Group Reviewers

Contributor Reviewers (ports)

Commits

rP554146: print/miktex: A TeX/LaTeX distribution featuring on-demand package installation.

Summary

Open problems:

Not sure what to put into LICENSE var. MiKTeX COPYING.md file states MiKTeX has neither a single copyright holder nor a single license covering its entire contents, since it is a collection of many independent packages.
To actually use installed package, user have to run miktexsetup finish, which would install additional files into ~/bin. Running this command as root would install into /usr/local/bin. There is no way to override these directories until https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/195 is fixed.

Diff Detail

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Build Status

Buildable 34562
Build 31656: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

arrowd created this revision.Jan 20 2019, 9:50 AM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B22056: Diff 53034.Jan 20 2019, 9:50 AM

rigoletto added a subscriber: rigoletto.Feb 8 2019, 4:22 PM

Hello.

I've updated to 2.9.6975, added some OPTIONS, and shut portlint. There are more OPTIONS opportunities like INSTALL_MIKTEX_HEADERS (fail to build with some Linux file missing) and WITH_LUA54TEX (lua54 is not in ports yet).

You could avail adding OPTIONS to LINK_EVERYTHING_STATICALLY and INSTALL_STATIC_LIBRARIES. :-)

[EDITED]
https://termbin.com/ott7
[EDITED]

The only downside of MiKTex would be the necessity to modify bsd.tex.mk in order to avoid Tex-Live ports installed for ports with USE_TEX.

Thank you! \o/

tcberner added a subscriber: tcberner.Feb 8 2019, 10:56 PM

tcberner added inline comments.

print/miktex/Makefile
20	^ when in doubt, leave it out :D
41	^ I would prefer USE_QT= core concurrent gui printsupport script scripttools uitools xml \ buildtools_build qmake_build
print/miktex/pkg-plist
195	^ these probably should not use `%%DATADIR%%`

From the Handbook:

LICENSE= UNKNOWN
LICENSE_NAME= unknown
LICENSE_TEXT= This program is NOT in public domain. It can be freely distributed for non-commercial purposes only.
LICENSE_PERMS= dist-mirror no-dist-sell pkg-mirror no-pkg-sell auto-accept

mat added a subscriber: mat.Feb 10 2019, 7:42 AM

mat added inline comments.

print/miktex/pkg-plist
193	DATADIR is a directory which means, it must always be `%%DATADIR%%/`.

There is a problem with luatex:

FATAL error while preloading lua module luatex_url_lua_open(L)Process 45975 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'miktex-luatex', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
    frame #0: 0x00000008011ac17a libc.so.7`__sys_thr_kill at thr_kill.S:3
   1   	#include "compat.h"
   2   	#include "SYS.h"
-> 3   	RSYSCALL(thr_kill)
   4   		.section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits

linimon retitled this revision from Add port for MiKTeX. to [new port] print/miktex: cross-platform implementation of TeX/LaTeX and related programs.Feb 18 2019, 2:51 AM

Update to 2.9.6980.
Incorporate changes by @rigoletto
Address comments

miktex-luatex requires net/luasocket for Lua 5.3, but there are no FLAVORS for Lua, so I can't depend on that. @mat, any thoughts how to workaround it?

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B22574: Diff 54067.Feb 19 2019, 12:28 PM

mat added inline comments.Feb 20 2019, 4:22 PM

print/miktex/Makefile
75–80	Please use options helpers.

Use option helpers for UIQT.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B23529: Diff 55829.Apr 5 2019, 6:25 AM

The question about net/luasocket stays open.

mat added inline comments.Apr 18 2019, 1:20 PM

print/miktex/Makefile
21	Please remove this. poudriere will build this without a problem, it has auto-accept. If you are testing a restricted port, sipmly add `DISABLE_LICENSES=yes` the make.conf.

Update to 7000, remove license hack.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B24034: Diff 56903.May 1 2019, 11:43 AM

So, I need net/luasocket for LUA 5.3. Should I open a PR requesting lua flavorization, or just create a net/luasocket53?

In D18903#433043, @arrowd wrote:

So, I need net/luasocket for LUA 5.3. Should I open a PR requesting lua flavorization, or just create a net/luasocket53?

I do not think anyone has plans to write flavors for USES=lua so openning a PR requesting it would probably be pointless.

In D18903#433045, @mat wrote:

I do not think anyone has plans to write flavors for USES=lua so openning a PR requesting it would probably be pointless.

I need a way forward. Should I start looking into flavorizing LUA, switching everything to lua 5.3 or creating a net/luasocket53?

In D18903#433214, @arrowd wrote:

In D18903#433045, @mat wrote:

I do not think anyone has plans to write flavors for USES=lua so openning a PR requesting it would probably be pointless.

I need a way forward. Should I start looking into flavorizing LUA, switching everything to lua 5.3 or creating a net/luasocket53?

I have no idea if having flavors for lua makes sense. I think the best way to move forward would be a luasocket53 port for now.

Properly install symlinks.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B24115: Diff 57071.May 5 2019, 6:39 PM

It turned out that miktex uses internal LUA and luasocket, so the new port isn't needed. Bad news is that I cannot figure out where the error comes from. Any help with debugging this would be welcome.

Upstream has fixed the LUA bug and it will be present in the next release.

arrowd planned changes to this revision.May 17 2019, 3:30 PM