Mark fdisk(8) obsolete.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by trasz on Aug 6 2015, 11:07 AM.

Details

Reviewers

wblock

Group Reviewers

manpages

Commits

rS287396: It's 2015, and some people are still trying to use fdisk and then

Summary

It's 2015, and some people are still trying to use fdisk and then
go asking what debug flags to set for GEOM to make it work. Point
them in the right direction.

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Passed

Unit

No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

trasz updated this revision to Diff 7703.Aug 6 2015, 11:07 AM

trasz retitled this revision from to Mark fdisk(8) obsolete..

trasz updated this object.

trasz edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

Herald added a reviewer: manpages. · View Herald TranscriptAug 6 2015, 11:07 AM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald Transcript

gpart(8) can replace both fdisk and bsdlabel. The note in the description for fdisk.8 should also be in bsdlabel.8. I think we could leave the rest of those two pages unchanged, but am not sure about the others.

I plan to do bsdlabel too, but it requires quite some more changes to do properly - translating all the usage cases to gpart - so I'd prefer to do fdisk first.

Tweak a little.

Herald edited edge metadata. · View Herald TranscriptAug 7 2015, 8:22 AM

wblock added inline comments.Aug 12 2015, 10:11 PM

sbin/bsdlabel/bsdlabel.8
452	I would use gpart to clear the old disklabel in s1. It's safer and more correct. `gpart destroy -F da0s1`

One more thing: should we use "obsolete", or "deprecated" here?

sbin/bsdlabel/bsdlabel.8
452	This command unfortunately returns an error when there was no partition table on da0s1 in the first place, which might be confusing to the user. So I'd prefer to leave it as it is.