pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F166948921: D24009.id69340.diff
	Tue, Aug 18, 1:04 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Aug 13, 9:04 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Aug 13, 7:45 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Aug 12, 11:41 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Aug 10, 3:26 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Aug 10, 3:10 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Aug 10, 3:09 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Jul 23, 4:28 AM

View All Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

markj

Commits

rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.

Summary

Suggested by: markj

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Build Status

Buildable 29856

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B29856: Diff 69339.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

markj accepted this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

Closed by commit rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyMar 9 2020, 11:40 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine..

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

kern/

sys_pipe.c

9 lines

Diff 69339

View Options

pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.ClosedPublicActions