pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F94618060: D24009.diff
	Tue, Sep 17, 9:08 PM

	F94605592: D24009.diff
	Tue, Sep 17, 8:21 PM

	F94559472: D24009.id.diff
	Tue, Sep 17, 5:24 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Sep 12, 7:38 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 8, 10:29 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 8, 9:02 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 8, 12:44 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 18 2024, 6:00 PM

View All 35 Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

markj

Commits

rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.

Summary

Suggested by: markj

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Build Status

Buildable 29856

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B29856: Diff 69339.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

markj accepted this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

Closed by commit rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyMar 9 2020, 11:40 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine..

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

kern/

sys_pipe.c

9 lines

Diff 69339

View Options

pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.ClosedPublicActions