pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F108515734: D24009.id69339.diff
	Sat, Jan 25, 7:49 PM

	F108515461: D24009.id69340.diff
	Sat, Jan 25, 7:47 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Jan 16, 10:09 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Dec 4 2024, 8:36 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 26 2024, 11:20 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 9 2024, 6:31 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 6 2024, 12:54 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Oct 24 2024, 8:22 PM

View All 51 Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

markj

Commits

rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.

Summary

Suggested by: markj

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Build Status

Buildable 29856

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B29856: Diff 69339.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

markj accepted this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

Closed by commit rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyMar 9 2020, 11:40 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine..

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

kern/

sys_pipe.c

9 lines

Diff 69339

View Options

pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.ClosedPublicActions