The very long table is hard to follow, I'm even wondering about putting each
table in a separate sect so that it goes into the TOC.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 5730 Build 6028: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I think this is a good idea. To go a step further, would it be more useful to have the tables in major revision descending order? FreeBSD 12 first, then 11, 10, and so on. As it is, most readers will usually have to scroll to near the end.
The note about 2.2-STABLE at the end of the file should be moved to just after the FreeBSD 2 table.
Comment Actions
- Move the note about FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE after the FreeBSD 2.2 table.
- Put each version in its section.
- Reverse the order of the sections, newest first.
This comment was removed by mat.
Comment Actions
Some of these are whitespace-only changes. I don't know how many groups have translated this document, though.