Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

sh.1: Cross-reference signal(3)
Needs ReviewPublic

Authored by temcbun_gmail.com on Mar 3 2026, 3:09 PM.
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, May 17, 1:28 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, May 17, 1:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, May 17, 11:31 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, May 17, 2:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, May 14, 12:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, May 14, 12:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, May 9, 10:14 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, May 9, 10:09 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

in the description of trap.

Even though there is a trap -l that lists signal numbers and names, I think it's still sensible to have a manual reference.

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

Is signal(3) the right reference? C code had better use sigaction(2) instead, or the list might be moved to a new signal(7) page?

Is signal(3) the right reference? C code had better use sigaction(2) instead, or the list might be moved to a new signal(7) page?

I was thinking about porting signal(7) from NetBSD too. I agree, that it would be a better place for the list and for the reference as well.