Move mbuf provider under SDT to indicate that it is FreeBSD specific and not a stable interface.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by gnn on Mar 23 2016, 7:03 AM.

Details

Reviewers

markj
bz

Commits

rS297227: Move mbuf provider under SDT to indicate that it is FreeBSD specific

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Passed

Unit

No Test Coverage

Build Status

Buildable 2989
Build 3019: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

gnn updated this revision to Diff 14541.Mar 23 2016, 7:03 AM

gnn retitled this revision from to Move mbuf provider under SDT to indicate that it is FreeBSD specific and not a stable interface..

gnn updated this object.

gnn edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

gnn added reviewers: markj, bz.

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 23 2016, 7:03 AM

These should not specify the module or function components of the probe name. That is, the probe name should be

sdt:::<probe name>

the module (and soon the function) component is filled in automatically, so one can automatically get probes like sdt:if_xl:xl_newbuf:m_getcl.

Other than that it looks fine to me. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 23 2016, 4:58 PM

Closed by commit rS297227: Move mbuf provider under SDT to indicate that it is FreeBSD specific (authored by gnn). · Explain WhyMar 24 2016, 8:26 AM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

kern/

uipc_mbuf.c

20 lines

sys/

mbuf.h

30 lines

Diff 14541

View Options

sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c