Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Update KDevelop to 4.7.3
ClosedPublic

Authored by adridg on Dec 31 2016, 12:12 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 18, 9:18 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Oct 5, 9:27 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Oct 5, 8:51 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Oct 5, 8:43 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 28 2024, 11:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 28 2024, 8:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 28 2024, 8:09 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 20 2024, 7:05 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

This updates the KDevelop port (and kdevplatform) for KDE4
to the latest version 4.7.3. Drops some patches previously
pulled from git, adds new ones.

Test Plan

The other kdevelop ports (-pg-qt and similar) need to be built.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

adridg retitled this revision from to Update KDevelop to 4.7.3.
adridg updated this object.
adridg edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
adridg added reviewers: kde, tcberner, rakuco.
adridg edited edge metadata.

kdevelop-php also new distfile.

adridg edited edge metadata.

Third time's the charm: also update kdevelop-php-docs

Mk/Uses/kde.mk
82 ↗(On Diff #23482)

I think we should drop this from kde.mk and define it in the ports themselves directly.

tcberner edited edge metadata.

There are plist-issues in devel/kdevelop-php-docs

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 31 2016, 10:21 AM
adridg edited edge metadata.

Update patch (4)

  • Removed kdevelop and kdevplatform versions from kde.mk, placed in a Makefile.common.
  • Add %%NLS%% substitution to kdevelop-php-docs plist.
  • (TODO?) Perhaps more things like MASTER_SITES could be set there.
  • (TODO?) Is .include right there at the top of the makefile the right thing to do?

Also note that the whole review mentions the wrong version: this update is from 4.7.3 -> 4.7.4

Mk/Uses/kde.mk
82 ↗(On Diff #23482)

I think we should drop this from kde.mk and define it in the ports themselves directly.

Can you explain why?

devel/kdevplatform/files/patch-cmake__modules__KDevPlatformMacros_cmake.patch
1 ↗(On Diff #23517)
Mk/Uses/kde.mk
82 ↗(On Diff #23482)

I don't see much benefit in it being defined in kde.mk -- I think we should only have KDE4/Frameworks/Plasma/Applications numbers in there, the stuff that actually is handled by kde.mk.

So CALLIGRA and KTP versions should be kicked too -- or DIGIKAM added :P

But don't let that be the hold up.

devel/kdevelop-kde4/Makefile
4 ↗(On Diff #23517)

If the choice is between having Makefile.common and defining the version in kde.mk, then I want kde.mk :)

adridg edited edge metadata.
  • Moved version number back to kde.mk
  • Fixed remaining plist issues with NLS
tcberner edited edge metadata.

Should be fine now -- sorry for the hassle.

adridg added inline comments.
devel/kdevelop-kde4/Makefile
4 ↗(On Diff #23517)

Since digikam had a Makefile.common -- for its family of ports -- and similarly kde-l10n and kdegames4, I figured it was a standard way of doing "all these ports belong together and need to be updated in lock-step". Apparently not.

devel/kdevplatform/files/patch-cmake__modules__KDevPlatformMacros_cmake.patch
1 ↗(On Diff #23517)

That'll go in a KDE Phab review; I'll add you as observer for it.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.