Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Record that ZFS removed libuutil just prior to 1600005 Use "(not changed) syntax rather than try to shove two gitrefs into a single cell.
ClosedPublic

Authored by asomers on Apr 28 2026, 2:10 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Aug 13, 7:10 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Aug 13, 10:43 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Aug 12, 9:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Aug 11, 7:13 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Aug 11, 7:11 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Aug 10, 8:05 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Aug 10, 12:09 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Aug 10, 11:40 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

asomers created this revision.
  • Merge the two gitrefs into a single cell

Updating D56692: Record that ZFS removed libuutil just prior to 1600005

Use "(not changed) syntax rather than try to shove two gitrefs into a
single cell.

Now the revision shows two ways to solve the problem:

  • The first commit puts the ZFS change in its own row, using "(not changed)" syntax like some other rows, for example 576ee62dd2e5 .
  • The second commit puts both changes in a single row. Rendered, each gitref gets its own line.

Personally, I like the second version, because "(not changed)" isn't very helpful for porters. For them, it's nice to get exactly one __FreeBSD_version per row. On the other hand, the second version's gitrefs are a little unclear. Without clicking on them, it's hard to tell which changed ZFS and which changed BUS_ALLOC_RESOURCE .

I'll commit whichever version my reviewers prefer.

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.May 11 2026, 3:18 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.