*/*: Use documented placeholder NETWOKING in RC scripts

[michaelo]

Summary

PR: 293652

[apevnev_me.com]

No problem with KEA, thanks!

[danfe]

Thanks for taking the effort to bring naming consistency across both src and ports. Can someone tell the story what was wrong with NETWORK (shorter base form) that it had to be replaced with NETWORKING (longer gerund form)? Or it simply better describes the matter, English-wise?

[michaelo]

In D55712#1275570, @danfe wrote:

Thanks for taking the effort to bring naming consistency across both src and ports. Can someone tell the story what was wrong with NETWORK (shorter base form) that it had to be replaced with NETWORKING (longer gerund form)? Or it simply better describes the matter, English-wise?

As far as I understand as a non-native English speaker is due to the fact that NETWORKING collects multiple services:

$ cat NETWORKING
#!/bin/sh
#
#

# PROVIDE: NETWORKING NETWORK
# REQUIRE: netif netwait netoptions routing ppp ipfw stf
# REQUIRE: defaultroute route6d resolv bridge
# REQUIRE: static_arp static_ndp

[michaelo]

Waiting for other maintainers.

[michaelo]

Rebase