Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

FreeBSD-EN-23:19.pkgbase
AbandonedPublic

Authored by markj on Dec 3 2023, 6:58 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Apr 21, 3:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Apr 19, 9:23 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Apr 4, 6:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Apr 4, 2:46 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 4 2024, 11:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 4 2024, 11:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 4 2024, 10:57 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 4 2024, 10:44 PM
Subscribers

Details

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

markj requested review of this revision.Dec 3 2023, 6:58 PM
markj created this revision.

This one is a bit unusual in that we're really doing it only so that the FreeBSD-produced sets start having the correct names. For most users there's no need to care about this at all, and of the users that care most don't care about this EN update per se, just the fact that the sets they are consuming have new names.

FreeBSD-EN-23:19.pkgbase
22

maybe "release artifacts" or "release images"?

24

Perhaps add something along the lines of making these available on an experimental basis starting with FreeBSD 14, or available for experimentation or so. I'd like readers to know most don't need to care about this issue since they're not officially supported for 14.0, but also give a clue as to why we're publishing an errata.

40

add "experimental" or similar again here

42

This issue might warrant a bespoke Solution section? This really affects only users consuming the pkgbase sets (and in that case they don't care about this EN) or users building pkgbase sets themselves.

88

I think we can leave this out when advisories don't affect 12.x

FreeBSD-EN-23:19.pkgbase
22–24
24

Good point - I will reword

40
58–59
88
markj marked 8 inline comments as done.Dec 4 2023, 3:23 PM
markj added inline comments.
FreeBSD-EN-23:19.pkgbase
42

Or perhaps just reiterate here that users not using pkgbase needn't bother?

Changes from dfr and emaste.

Looks good to me - the paragraphs I edited may need reformatting since I probably didn't estimate the 72 column mark consistently.