textproc/jq: jq --version shows no version
AbandonedPublic
Actions

Authored by michaelo on Nov 24 2023, 4:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Jun 23, 9:55 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	May 8 2024, 9:20 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	May 8 2024, 6:49 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 18 2024, 2:48 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jan 5 2024, 10:36 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Dec 28 2023, 9:35 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Dec 25 2023, 5:29 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Dec 24 2023, 9:33 PM

View All 10 Files

Subscribers

None

Details

Reviewers

jrm
otis
yuri

Summary

PR: 275294
Reported by: Vedran Miletic <vedran@miletic.net>
Approved by: jrm (mentor), otis (mentor), yuri

Diff Detail

Repository

R11 FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Build Status

Buildable 54606
Build 51495: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

michaelo requested review of this revision.Nov 24 2023, 4:16 PM

michaelo created this revision.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B54606: Diff 130513.Nov 24 2023, 4:16 PM

The problem here is that upstream expects us to either use the published tarballs or have git available to determine the version. Using the published tarballs is also preferable because the ones generated from GitHub are not indefinitely stable. I took a shot at redoing the port using upstream's published tarball and also made portclippy/portfmt happy.

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42758

diizzy retitled this revision from extproc/jq: jq --version shows no version to textproc/jq: jq --version shows no version.Nov 27 2023, 5:28 PM

Superseded by @jrm and @yuri, closing this one.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

textproc/

jq/

Makefile

7 lines

Diff 130513

View Options

textproc/jq: jq --version shows no versionAbandonedPublicActions