Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Update netstat.1 to give a notion of the existence of nexthops and nexthop groups
Changes PlannedPublic

Authored by zarychtam_plan-b.pwste.edu.pl on Mar 29 2023, 12:23 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Oct 29, 12:11 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 28, 4:21 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 10 2024, 10:45 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 10 2024, 5:38 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 9 2024, 9:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 9 2024, 5:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 8 2024, 10:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 8 2024, 12:24 PM

Details

Reviewers
melifaro
gbe
Group Reviewers
manpages
Summary

Nexthops were introduced in fedeb08b6a58e and a666325282eae. Perhaps the users of FreeBSD want to see them in netstat(1). Let's stop hiding this valuable data from them.

Test Plan

netstat -o4
netstat -o4W
netstat -o6
netstat -o6W
netstat -O4
netstat -O6

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

In the future FreeBSD will have ip(8) or it's analogue. Mentioning now these temporary -o -O in netstat(1) will probably bring more harm than benefit, so the -o and -O options should remain as options for insiders.

In the future FreeBSD will have ip(8) or it's analogue.

I hope not. Last year Alexander had conducted a poll in our local group, and while it's not 100% representative, vast majority of votes were to preserve the status quo. I won't mind (or care) having something like ip(8) in ports, but please don't plague the base system with this linuxish filth.