13.2R/signatures partial readiness for RC4

[• grahamperrin]

Summary

13.2R/signatures partial readiness for RC4 by grahamperrin · Pull Request #136 · freebsd/freebsd-doc

From https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-doc/pull/136/commits/761aedc543e7f4149afdbc039150f8722251d349:

Improve upon recent https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-doc/commit/2bec8ac80bb0d3d8f74a8a5c211879a65498d85f?diff=unified#diff-d84669272c8e6ac064d0375e96ae847ce5d44c3a5d9d41078496621d8233c3f9R17-R18 for release candidate 3, where I commented out a line but overlooked the presence of:

:localBranchName:

Prepare the upper part of the page, but not the checksums, for RC4.

Origin of this diff:

• https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/freebsd/freebsd-doc/pull/136.diff.

Test Plan

Preview in GitHub:

• https://github.com/grahamperrin/freebsd-doc/blob/13.2-RC4/website/content/en/releases/13.2R/signatures.adoc#readme.

[gjb]

website/content/en/releases/13.2R/signatures.adoc

18

Personally, I would do this as a separate commit, but I will not be too picky about it.

[• grahamperrin]

Overlap with https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-doc/commit/eabc16b5ce21a5d6b2f90541a7181a13da00e83d#diff-d84669272c8e6ac064d0375e96ae847ce5d44c3a5d9d41078496621d8233c3f9, I need to learn about dealing with conflicts at the command line …

[• grahamperrin]

In D39237#893813, @grahamperrin wrote:

… I need to learn about dealing with conflicts at the command line …

Instead, I used GitQlient devel/gitqlient to produce a .patch file that included what was required.