Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

12.4 release notes: add the (expected) date
AbandonedPublic

Authored by grahamperrin on Nov 29 2022, 12:26 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 28 2024, 7:49 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 20 2023, 6:04 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 7 2023, 5:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 31 2023, 6:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 6 2023, 4:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 28 2023, 12:52 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jun 19 2023, 8:00 PM
Unknown Object (File)
May 4 2023, 9:11 PM

Details

Reviewers
None
Group Reviewers
releng
Summary

Generally: it is fairly commonplace for release notes to include the date of release.

FreeBSD release notes (traditionally): without a date, the reader can step away then find the information elsewhere (maybe https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup, or an announcement, or the schedule).

Consider including the release date in this set of notes, and in future sets.

Test Plan

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

grahamperrin created this revision.
website/content/en/releases/12.4R/relnotes.adoc
19

5 or 5th?

To me (British English), 5th seems more natural.

https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/fdp-primer/writing-style/#writing-style-guidelines suggests American English for spelling, I don't know whether this encompasses dates. Neither do I know whether 5th December 2022 would look weird to an American.


Alternatively, 2022-12-05, although I reckon that longhand will look better in this context.

zlei added inline comments.
website/content/en/releases/12.4R/relnotes.adoc
19

Recent history release note use date format December 7, 2021, see [1] and [2]

Both 5 December 2022 and December 5, 2022 look good to me, but I'd prefer the latter for consistence.

[1] https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.1R/announce/
[2] https://www.freebsd.org/releases/12.3R/announce/

grahamperrin added inline comments.
website/content/en/releases/12.4R/relnotes.adoc
19

Interesting, thanks.

I chose date (number) before month for consistency, because I'm more familiar with this order at pages such as these:

I guess, we should change the order, for consistency with the other date, which is already within the page:

Abandon?

Yes. This is part of the final release wrap-up.

Branch https://github.com/grahamperrin/freebsd-doc/tree/12-4-relnotes-date deleted.

Looking ahead: consider having a release date near the head of release notes for 13.2.