Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

math/armadillo: Update to 11.1.1
ClosedPublic

Authored by salvadore on May 22 2022, 2:31 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Oct 13, 2:30 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Oct 10, 1:49 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 24, 1:36 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 12 2025, 9:13 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 10 2025, 2:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 9 2025, 8:44 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 21 2025, 1:17 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 21 2025, 12:06 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
R11 FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

I could not find a changelog for this minor version, see http://arma.sourceforge.net/docs.html#changelog. That's why my commit message is only the summary.

As for testing, I could not test any i386 version because -- again -- sysutils/slurm-wlm is in the dependency tree, which is NOT_FOR_ARCHS=i386. Since it is the third time that I find this issue, I have started to work to resolve it, see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262010#c9 . In case all attempt to fix it fail, I will consider setting a NOT_FOR_ARCHS variable for this port too.

All tests are successfull on amd64.

And I think spending much time on ports related to HPC and scientific computing specifically to get them to work on i386 is mostly wasted time.

That is, we should try not to break anything, but if it is broken already ... mark it thusly (or NOT_FOR_ARCHS) and don't worry too much.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 22 2022, 8:19 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

Thanks Gerald for your advice. After having read it, I did some research and noticed on https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ that with FreeBSD 13 the i386 architecture is downgraded from tier 1 to tier 2, so I see that you are indeed right.

However, in this particular case:

So I think it worths a try. That said, if things get harder, I will surely follow your advice and just set NOT_FOR_ARCHS.