Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

ocs_fc: Do not respond to unsolicited NOP BLS command.
ClosedPublic

Authored by ram on Mar 3 2022, 12:56 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F157023901: D34423.diff
Mon, May 18, 12:22 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 12:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 12:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 12:22 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, May 4, 11:07 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 28, 11:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 28, 11:17 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 9 2026, 8:56 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

ram requested review of this revision.Mar 3 2022, 12:57 PM

It makes some sense to me. I suppose other cases could be NOP and BA_ACC/BA_REJ, which do not require action if unsolicited. I just guess incoming BA_* for outgoing ABTS are handled somewhere else, if they reach the driver at all.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 3 2022, 4:01 PM
In D34423#779963, @mav wrote:

It makes some sense to me. I suppose other cases could be NOP and BA_ACC/BA_REJ, which do not require action if unsolicited. I just guess incoming BA_* for outgoing ABTS are handled somewhere else, if they reach the driver at all.

Yes, the ABTS response will be handled by corresponding WQE.