Previously, cv_waiters was only updated by cv_signal or cv_wait. If a
thread awakened due to a time out, then cv_waiters was not decremented.
If INT_MAX threads timed out on a cv without an intervening cv_broadcast,
then cv_waiters could overflow. To fix this, have each sleeping thread
decrement cv_waiters when it resumes.
Note that previously cv_waiters was protected by the sleepq chain lock.
However, that lock is not held when threads resume from sleep. In
addition, the interlock is also not always reacquired after resuming
(cv_wait_unlock), nor is it always held by callers of cv_signal() or
cv_broadcast(). Instead, use atomic ops to update cv_waiters. Since
the sleepq chain lock is still held on every increment, it should
still be safe to compare cv_waiters against zero while holding the
lock in the wakeup routines as the only way the race should be lost
would result in extra calls to sleepq_signal() or sleepq_broadcast().