pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	F163434779: D24009.id69340.diff
	Thu, Jul 23, 4:28 AM

	F163401567: D24009.id69339.diff
	Wed, Jul 22, 9:30 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Jul 20, 4:49 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jun 22 2026, 8:41 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	May 30 2026, 6:32 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	May 29 2026, 3:21 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Apr 30 2026, 9:10 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Apr 27 2026, 6:26 PM

View All Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

markj

Commits

rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.

Summary

Suggested by: markj

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B29856: Diff 69339.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

markj accepted this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

Closed by commit rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyMar 9 2020, 11:40 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine..

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

head/

sys/

kern/

sys_pipe.c

9 lines

Diff 69340

View Options

pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.ClosedPublicActions