pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by kib on Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Oct 8, 3:18 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Sep 30, 12:25 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 11 2025, 5:21 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 9 2025, 1:13 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 4 2025, 7:00 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 22 2025, 8:20 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 14 2025, 9:35 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jul 18 2025, 12:09 AM

View All 83 Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

markj

Commits

rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.

Summary

Suggested by: markj

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

kib created this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptMar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B29856: Diff 69339.Mar 9 2020, 11:16 PM

markj accepted this revision.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 9 2020, 11:21 PM

Closed by commit rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine. (authored by kib). · Explain WhyMar 9 2020, 11:40 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

kib added a commit: rS358827: pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine..

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

head/

sys/

kern/

sys_pipe.c

9 lines

Diff 69340

View Options

pipe: explain why not deallocating inode number is fine.ClosedPublicActions