Don't process SIOCGIFADDR the same way with SIOCSIFADDR.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by delphij on Jan 13 2015, 1:28 AM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Nov 24, 6:46 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sat, Nov 23, 3:49 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Nov 5, 7:47 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Oct 20 2024, 2:34 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 17 2024, 9:30 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 8 2024, 9:37 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 7 2024, 8:12 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sep 7 2024, 7:21 AM

View All 73 Files

Subscribers

None

Details

Reviewers

gibbs
glebius
royger

Commits

rS277103: Use the common codepath to handle SIOCGIFADDR.

Summary

The current code handles SIOCGIFADDR the same way with
SIOCSIFADDR, which involves full arp_ifinit, et al. They should
be unnecessary for SIOCGIFADDR case.

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

delphij updated this revision to Diff 3137.Jan 13 2015, 1:28 AM

delphij retitled this revision from to Don't process SIOCGIFADDR the same way with SIOCSIFADDR..

delphij updated this object.

delphij edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

delphij added reviewers: gibbs, royger, glebius.

glebius accepted this revision.Jan 13 2015, 4:41 AM

glebius edited edge metadata.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 13 2015, 4:41 AM

Closed by commit rS277103 (authored by @delphij).

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

dev/

xen/

netback/

netback.c

1 line

netfront/

netfront.c

1 line

Diff 3137

View Options

sys/dev/xen/netback/netback.c