Don't process SIOCGIFADDR the same way with SIOCSIFADDR.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by delphij on Jan 13 2015, 1:28 AM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Dec 24, 6:48 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Dec 12, 4:35 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Dec 8, 7:52 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Dec 2, 10:13 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Dec 2, 4:27 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sat, Nov 30, 12:31 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 24 2024, 6:46 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 23 2024, 3:49 PM

View All 79 Files

Subscribers

None

Details

Reviewers

gibbs
glebius
royger

Commits

rS277103: Use the common codepath to handle SIOCGIFADDR.

Summary

The current code handles SIOCGIFADDR the same way with
SIOCSIFADDR, which involves full arp_ifinit, et al. They should
be unnecessary for SIOCGIFADDR case.

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

delphij updated this revision to Diff 3137.Jan 13 2015, 1:28 AM

delphij retitled this revision from to Don't process SIOCGIFADDR the same way with SIOCSIFADDR..

delphij updated this object.

delphij edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

delphij added reviewers: gibbs, royger, glebius.

glebius accepted this revision.Jan 13 2015, 4:41 AM

glebius edited edge metadata.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 13 2015, 4:41 AM

Closed by commit rS277103 (authored by @delphij).

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

head/

sys/

dev/

xen/

netback/

netback.c

1 line

netfront/

netfront.c

1 line

Diff 3139

View Options

head/sys/dev/xen/netback/netback.c