Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

biology/ncbi-blast+: Upgrade to 2.7.1
ClosedPublic

Authored by jwb on Mar 26 2018, 1:09 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Jun 21, 7:49 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 22 2024, 2:59 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 19 2024, 4:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
May 19 2024, 4:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
May 16 2024, 12:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 15 2024, 11:39 PM
Unknown Object (File)
May 15 2024, 8:36 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 4 2024, 3:19 PM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
jrm
wen
Group Reviewers
O5: Ports Framework(Owns No Changed Paths)
portmgr
Commits
rP465726: biology/ncbi-blast+: Upgrade to 2.7.1
Summary

biology/ncbi-blast+: Upgrade to 2.7.1
Approved by jrm (mentor) or wen (mentor)
Differential to be added to commit message
Resolves the following PRs:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225002
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226037

Test Plan

portlint -A: looks fine
Passed poudriere on {10.3,11.1}-{amd64,i386}

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Looks good to me. I wonder if MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes is warranted? For one poudriere run, I saw all 4 builds (10/11 i386/amd64) fail and there are lots of warnings like this gmake[5]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode. http://pkg.awarnach.mathstat.dal.ca/data/11amd64-default/2018-03-26_14h21m50s/logs/errors/ncbi-blast+-2.7.1.log Subsequent builds were fine (I don't think I changed anything). I also tested with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and those warnings went away and it actually built quicker.

That's interesting. I tested with poudriere on a 32-thread machine with no
issues. I saw the warnings, but the builds all succeeded. But, if it built
faster for you with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, it's a moot point.

I'm also removing the empty directories under lib that I overlooked before.
Retesting before I commit, of course.

rene added inline comments.
Mk/bsd.local.mk
31 ↗(On Diff #40761)

This change seems irrelevant to the port.

jwb marked an inline comment as done.Mar 26 2018, 9:04 PM
Mk/bsd.local.mk
31 ↗(On Diff #40761)

I'm not sure how that got into the diff, arc should have ignored it. At any rate, only the contents of biology/ncbi-blast+ will be committed.

biology/ncbi-blast+/Makefile
48 ↗(On Diff #40761)
WRKSRC_SUBDIR= c++

Looks good with Mat's suggestion.

Switch to WRKSRC_SUBDIR

Patch Makefile.in.top for a cleaner way to support DESTDIR

Please review DESTDIR patch and re-approve

Nothing obvious stands out to me. Are these changes suitable for inclusion upstream?

biology/ncbi-blast+/Makefile
63 ↗(On Diff #40799)

${RM} includes the -f flag.

Yes, a patch I can send upstream was one of my goals with this change. Thanks...

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Mar 27 2018, 6:04 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.