Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

New port: security/botan2: Portable, easy to use and efficient C++ crypto library
ClosedPublic

Authored by yuri on Nov 11 2017, 8:59 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 1 2024, 4:46 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 1 2024, 4:46 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 1 2024, 4:46 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 1 2024, 3:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 24 2023, 5:09 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 23 2023, 10:47 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 21 2023, 11:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 9 2023, 11:05 PM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

security/botan2/Makefile
8 ↗(On Diff #35092)

PORTNAME=Botan and not setting this should work

yuri marked an inline comment as done.Nov 11 2017, 9:18 AM
yuri added inline comments.
security/botan2/Makefile
8 ↗(On Diff #35092)

PORTNAME=Botan and not setting this should work

It would work, but IMO there's no point in making the port name capitalized.
Please look at xorg, apache, qt - all these are routinely capitalized when written in text, but port names aren't capitalized. botan is not any different.

I would tend to make PORTNAME capitalized when it has a special case of capitalization, like qTox, arXive, etc, not just routine one (when only the first letter is capitalized).

yuri retitled this revision from New port: Portable, easy to use and efficient C++ crypto library to New port: security/botan2: Portable, easy to use and efficient C++ crypto library.Nov 11 2017, 10:14 AM
yuri marked 2 inline comments as done.
security/botan2/files/patch-src_lib_prov_openssl_openssl__rsa.cpp
7 ↗(On Diff #35092)

^ this could be upstreamed

yuri marked an inline comment as done.Nov 11 2017, 4:11 PM
yuri added inline comments.
security/botan2/files/patch-src_lib_prov_openssl_openssl__rsa.cpp
7 ↗(On Diff #35092)
yuri marked 2 inline comments as done.Nov 11 2017, 4:27 PM
security/botan2/Makefile
8 ↗(On Diff #35092)

Yes, but their distfile is not called "Xorg-server" :)

I don't mind either choice, so go with your gut

security/botan2/files/patch-src_lib_prov_openssl_openssl__rsa.cpp
7 ↗(On Diff #35092)

good job

yuri marked 2 inline comments as done.Nov 11 2017, 5:11 PM
yuri added inline comments.
security/botan2/Makefile
8 ↗(On Diff #35092)

On one hand, the previous (1.X) version uses 'botan': security/botan110
On the other hand, 'Botan' isn't how it is specifically marketed. It is 'Botan' only because the generic proper name capitalization rule is applied.
So I would choose 'botan'. :)

security/botan2/files/patch-src_lib_prov_openssl_openssl__rsa.cpp
7 ↗(On Diff #35092)

Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Nov 11 2017, 6:06 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
yuri marked 2 inline comments as done.
head/security/botan2/Makefile
41

This is bogus, obviously, but I wonder what it does, exactly.

I think it will generate an empty BROKEN_SSL variable, and maybe an openssl-devel variable containing openssl-devel.

It should be written as:

SSL_VARS=  BROKEN_SSL=openssl-devel

But, as BROKEN_SSL does not do anything unless you USES=ssl, simply write:

BROKEN_SSL=  openssl-devel