Default www/rubygem-thin to rack, not rack16

[adamw]

Summary

www/rubygem-thin works just fine with rack 2.x as of https://github.com/macournoyer/thin/commit/f4788965226421e50b1d9bd442ea1db84444529b. So, depend on www/rubygem-rack rather than rubygem-rack16.

[swills]

The only things I see depending on thin is databases/leo_center and optionally redmine. Can you run test or at least check the Gemfiles of those to see if this causes issues? Build tests don't always catch ruby run time issues.

Makefile

18

You want to change this to >=2 so that people who have 1.6 installed are forced to update.

[adamw]

Both of them want rack-1.6. redmine's Gemfile says it doesn't care, but its dependencies rely upon rack-1.6. leo_center can't handle rack-2.0 at all. leo_center doesn't require rack with a version spec, so it chokes.

Sounds like just adding an OPTION to choose the backend for thin makes more sense.

[swills]

In D10998#228104, @adamw wrote:

Both of them want rack-1.6. redmine's Gemfile says it doesn't care, but its dependencies rely upon rack-1.6. leo_center can't handle rack-2.0 at all. leo_center doesn't require rack with a version spec, so it chokes.

Sounds like just adding an OPTION to choose the backend for thin makes more sense.

We need to have two ports for thin, one that depends on rack 1.x and another that depends on rack 2.x. Maybe "rubygem-thin" and "rubygem-thin-rack1" makes sense.