It looks like we never issued the 2017-10 - 2017-12 report, and there was very little in it

https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2017-10-2017-12.html

Should this file be named 2017-10-2018-09.xml ?

this markup in the middle of the paragraph seems off

Should these be headings?

missing link

more forgiving than was

I might be worth expanding MI or even saying 'architecture independent'

s/management/Management/
(it's capitalized in the entry below)

s/automatically be built/automatically built/

You can write text directly after the <p> tag, no need to keep it on a line of its own.

This could easily be one line: <p>2018 Q2</p>

Is this one really necessary?

There is no link here at (here). I'd just remove it or find the original link (blog post?).

The colon (:) can be removed here.

s/Arm/ARM/ (acronym)

The comma here can go.

Leftover? These can go...

Another one bites the dust...

I think the dash between "On" and "top" here is not needed.

The "is" here is superfluous.

s/Works/Work/

s/compile/compiled/

s/Further/Further,/

s/using web browser/using a web browser/

s/as a candidates/as candidates/

Well, tbh it's been described a few times as applying to the past three quarters. I'd rather leave it as it is.

Those are "level 3 headings", and were marked as "<p>" in the previous report; I've decided to follow that markup for now.