Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

biology/canu: Upgrade to 1.7 release
ClosedPublic

Authored by jwb on Apr 25 2018, 6:39 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F103913097: D15201.id41876.diff
Sun, Dec 1, 3:15 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 28, 10:59 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 7, 3:37 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 7, 2:42 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 7, 1:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 23 2024, 6:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 23 2024, 6:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 23 2024, 6:23 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

biology/canu: Upgrade to 1.7 release
Approved by jrm (mentor) or wen (mentor)
Differential to be added to commit message

Test Plan

portlint -AC: looks fine
Passed poudriere on {10.4,11.1}-{amd64,i386}
Tested in production

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 16307
Build 16248: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

biology/canu/Makefile
53

$$(...) ? It's not an issue here, but there are some compelling arguments. https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/082

Thanks, I'm actually agnostic about things like this (and disagree with any argument that one way should *always* be preferred). I just use whichever syntax is more readable in a given situation. In this case, I think `` is cleaner, because it stands out against the other $ chars in the string. Where there are quotes, I tend to prefer $(). As for nesting output capture, I just avoid it. I'll break it into two commands, the first being a variable assignment. As I've aged, I've shifted toward a preference for readability over hyper-efficiency and cleverness. ( More referring to C syntax regarding efficiency, it's a non-issue in shell commands). ;-)

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 26 2018, 2:29 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.