Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Add all py-certbot plugins.
ClosedPublic

Authored by mat on Feb 8 2018, 10:52 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F122613893: D14262.id.diff
Sun, Jul 6, 6:16 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jul 6, 2:37 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 29, 12:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 29, 12:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 29, 12:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 29, 8:30 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 29, 6:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jun 23, 1:41 AM

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

  • Add py-certbot-dns-route53, Route53 DNS Authenticator for py-certbot.
mat added subscribers: cpm, koobs, skreuzer.

Add a few individuals for port updates:

  • @skreuzer for www/py-python-digitalocean
  • @koobs for security/py-certbot
  • @cpm for security/py-acme

ah sorry. I also had a bugzilla PR assigned me to update this port. I didn't see this diff until after I updated the port.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Feb 8 2018, 4:12 PM

@mat

Thanks for working on this!

The ports look good to me. I only have suggestions of COMMENT and pkg-descr. Thanks!

security/py-certbot-apache/Makefile
10 ↗(On Diff #39040)

People should already know what Certbot is when he/she tries to install the plugin port.
Since it's a plugin port, I would suggest to use "Apache plugin for Certbot" from its setup.py.

It also applies to other plugin ports.

security/py-certbot-apache/pkg-descr
1–2 ↗(On Diff #39040)

Can we remove this line?

3–8 ↗(On Diff #39040)

Do we need description of Certbot in the pkg-descr of each plugin ports?
Can we just use "This is the Apache plugin of Certbot (security/py-certbot)" instead?

In D14262#299543, @cpm wrote:

@mat

Thanks for working on this!

Would you mind terribly if py-acme was given to python@ ? So that it is easier to update the whole suite of ports ? (Same question for @koobs and py-certbot)

In D14262#300439, @mat wrote:
In D14262#299543, @cpm wrote:

@mat

Thanks for working on this!

Would you mind terribly if py-acme was given to python@ ? So that it is easier to update the whole suite of ports ? (Same question for @koobs and py-certbot)

I totally agree. I will drop maintainership for security/py-acme and security/py-josepy ports to give them to python@

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.