Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

cpucontrol: Be more strict with input validation
ClosedPublic

Authored by markj on Jan 27 2026, 9:23 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 13, 3:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 13, 11:39 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 13, 4:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Mar 1, 3:23 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Feb 23, 8:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Feb 22, 11:32 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Feb 16, 7:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Feb 16, 7:01 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Avoid truncating 32-bit values. This would have saved me a bit of time
when I was looking at a cpuid leaf on my system and typed 0x80000001f
instead of 0x8000001f.

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 70174
Build 67057: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

markj requested review of this revision.Jan 27 2026, 9:23 PM
usr.sbin/cpucontrol/cpucontrol.c
123

Why not strtoumax() then?

126

I do not think that usage() is required there, user does know what she did, but mis-typed the input.

markj marked 2 inline comments as done.

Handle kib's comments.

usr.sbin/cpucontrol/cpucontrol.c
126

Ok, I just copied the prevailing pattern.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 27 2026, 11:22 PM