Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Take maintainership for x11/yakuake-kde4 and rename it to x11/yakuake (to be replaced by the kf5-version in the future).
ClosedPublic

Authored by tcberner on Mar 12 2017, 8:47 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:45 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:32 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 16, 1:06 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 11 2024, 11:42 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary
  • Rename the port
  • Take maintainership

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Is there a reason not to move to 3.0.2 in the same commit? Does the KF5 work fine on KDE4?

MOVED
9134 ↗(On Diff #26178)

There's an older entry for x11/yakuake that needs to be removed.

  • Include the update to 3.0.2

I don't see a reason why it would not work with KDE4. As I do not have KDE4, I
would be happy, if you could give it a go though.

I tried it here with KDE4 from ports. Yakuake launches, but fails to show any terminal with an error message saying "Yakuake was unable to load the Konsole component. A Konsole installation is required to use Yakuake".

Don't update it yet -- as rakuco@ pointed out, it needs a kf5-based konsole installation.

To be honest, I don't see a lot of value in renaming the port while keeping it KDE4-based (even the reasoning in MOVED looks a bit weak in this case). How about just taking maintainership, and then renaming/updating the port once the Konsole5 KPart makes its way to the tree?

Does MAINTAINER change still require a PORTVERSION bump?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 13 2017, 8:23 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.