net-im/skype4: mark as BROKEN
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by xmj on Oct 7 2014, 9:12 AM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sat, Dec 21, 4:13 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Dec 11, 4:57 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Dec 8, 4:23 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Dec 5, 12:20 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Dec 4, 5:36 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 21 2024, 3:43 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 17 2024, 8:56 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 17 2024, 8:56 PM

View All Files

Subscribers

Details

Reviewers

swills
koobs

Summary

Mark Skype 4.3 as broken until lemul branch gets merged to HEAD...

net-im/skype4: mark as BROKEN

 - Mark as BOKEN due to missing syscalls

 (DiffRev: Placeholder)
Approved by:	swills (mentor)

Test Plan

brokenness makes testing moot.

Diff Detail

Repository

rP FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

xmj updated this revision to Diff 1902.Oct 7 2014, 9:12 AM

xmj retitled this revision from to net-im/skype4: mark as BROKEN.

xmj updated this object.

xmj edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

xmj added reviewers: swills, koobs.

Looks fine I guess... Are we going to get the new syscalls soon? :)

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 7 2014, 2:10 PM

Committed revision 370337.

Hi,

is anything except this one is needed? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192842
I wan't to test, but not sure if that's enough.

In D907#8, @rm wrote:

Hi,

is anything except this one is needed? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192842
I wan't to test, but not sure if that's enough.

I don't actually know.

You'll certainly need https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/dchagin/lemul/ as mentioned in the PR,
and Vassilis' patch.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

net-im/

skype4/

Makefile

2 lines

Diff 1902

View Options

net-im/skype4: mark as BROKENClosedPublicActions