misc/py-socli: Update to 1.7
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by cpm on Jun 25 2016, 9:42 AM.

Details

Reviewers

AMDmi3
junovitch
koobs
feld

Commits

rP417521: - Update to 1.7

Summary

Update to 1.7 release
Switch to GH
Update WWW in pkg-descr

Changes:

Added new question feature
Fixed windows color problem
Intelligent colors
Added open in browser

Test Plan

It fails to build via poudriere because python27 is the default version.

misc/py-socli for instance, can only work for python 3+, it
depends on textproc/py-beautifulsoup4 but it can't build because py-sphinx was built
for the default version.

Diff Detail

Repository

rP FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

cpm updated this revision to Diff 17881.Jun 25 2016, 9:42 AM

cpm retitled this revision from to misc/py-socli: Update to 1.5a.

cpm updated this object.

cpm edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

cpm added reviewers: AMDmi3, junovitch, feld.

cpm added a reviewer: koobs.Jun 25 2016, 10:50 AM

Use DISTVERSIONS for non standard (dotted integer) version numbers.

Also, socli is currently 1.7 upstream

Do you want to update to that version?

Update to 1.7 release
Switch to GH
Update WWW in pkg-descr

Changes:

Added new question feature
Fixed windows color problem
Intelligent colors
Added open in browser

In D6964#146010, @koobs wrote:

Use DISTVERSIONS for non standard (dotted integer) version numbers.

Also, socli is currently 1.7 upstream

Do you want to update to that version?

Good point, Kubilay. Done!

All builds are fine via poudriere after adding 'DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.4' in poudriere.d/make.conf

Looks good. Thank you Carlos.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 26 2016, 12:14 PM

In D6964#146075, @junovitch wrote:

Looks good. Thank you Carlos.

Thanks Jason,

Considering what I have described in the test plan.

What should I do with the failures from pkg-fallout?

Closed by commit rP417521: - Update to 1.7 (authored by cpm). · Explain WhyJun 26 2016, 12:37 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

cpm mentioned this in rP417521: - Update to 1.7.

In D6964#146079, @cpm wrote:

In D6964#146075, @junovitch wrote:

Looks good. Thank you Carlos.

Thanks Jason,

Considering what I have described in the test plan.

What should I do with the failures from pkg-fallout?

Ah, sorry I missed that comment earlier. Without the VARIANTS support in ports yet this port would need to require a py3-* origin for its dependencies. There are several examples through the tree.

In D6964#146083, @junovitch wrote:

In D6964#146079, @cpm wrote:

In D6964#146075, @junovitch wrote:

Looks good. Thank you Carlos.

Thanks Jason,

Considering what I have described in the test plan.

What should I do with the failures from pkg-fallout?

Ah, sorry I missed that comment earlier. Without the VARIANTS support in ports yet this port would need to require a py3-* origin for its dependencies. There are several examples through the tree.