Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Bug 208579 - 10.2 is missing from www/releases

Authored by on Apr 30 2016, 6:02 AM.


Group Reviewers

Added the appropriate missing section into releases/index.xml to include 10.2 release

  • Defined rel1 instead of moving the release count up and potentially breaking things across the site.
  • Igor cleanup (as much as possible, headsup: had to break a few long lines)


Test Plan
  • web build
  • igor run

Diff Detail

rD FreeBSD doc repository - subversion
Lint Skipped
Unit Tests Skipped

Event Timeline retitled this revision from to Bug 208579 - 10.2 is missing from www/releases. updated this object. edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details) added reviewers: releng, wblock. set the repository for this revision to rD FreeBSD doc repository - subversion. updated this object.

In addition to adding 10.2 under releases/

  • added 10.2 to production list on homepage
  • added 10.2 release section on ‘where’ aka download page


Thank you for the patch. I will look tomorrow, unless someone commits before I do.

Superficially, it looks fine, but there are a few dragons in these parts of the tree that may need special attention. But I think your change does the right thing.

Actually, on closer review, your change contains non-content changes (whitespace, etc).

This will need modification before it can be committed.

In D6156#131660, @gjb wrote:

Actually, on closer review, your change contains non-content changes (whitespace, etc).

The non-content changes were done to attempt to cleanup some of the igor warnings. I can revert them if that is what is desired. Let me know - thanks.

Updated diff to remove igor fixes and focus only on content. We can do a igor cleanup pass separately.

We already have a messed with the arbitrarily-numbered release entities. They are used in numerous places in the Handbook and probably elsewhere. Adding more of them is likely to make keeping them accurate even more difficult. That said, I don't know what the better approach would be.

@wblock should we at least get this changed for now so that the information online is accurate?

gjb added a reviewer: gjb.

Sorry for the delay. This has been committed.
Thank you for the patch.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 19 2016, 5:57 PM

No worries - glad it made it in :)