Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

sysutils/opensbi: update to v1.8
Needs ReviewPublic

Authored by mhorne on Tue, Dec 30, 4:29 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F141067586: D54421.id168779.diff
Wed, Dec 31, 11:11 AM
F141049758: D54421.diff
Wed, Dec 31, 5:18 AM
F141047344: D54421.id168779.diff
Wed, Dec 31, 4:31 AM
F141045770: D54421.id.diff
Wed, Dec 31, 4:00 AM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
None
Group Reviewers
riscv
Summary

In this update, drop the workaround patch for FU540 as no longer
supported (?).

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

Diff Detail

Repository
R11 FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 69529
Build 66412: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

mhorne created this revision.

I think the question is more "do we want to support FU540?"

If the workaround is still working and no impact to others, it probably doesn't very hurt.
But it it cause issues, we may remove its support, along with sysutils/u-boot-sifive-fu540.

I think the question is more "do we want to support FU540?"

If the workaround is still working and no impact to others, it probably doesn't very hurt.
But it it cause issues, we may remove its support, along with sysutils/u-boot-sifive-fu540.

I've opened this discussion out-of-band.

It only causes me a small headache with each update of the port, as I have to regenerate the patches. The hardware is exceedingly rare, however.

Yes, removal of sysutils/u-boot-sifive-fu540 would be the next step.